SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (44765)9/17/2002 10:46:30 AM
From: Rascal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Black and White.

I recently saw Win Post something that is totally contrary to you current positions.

Were you lying then or are you lying now?

Becoming current on Ritter's position then and now is really mandatory for us to discuss this furthur. I am not interested in a "gotcha", I am interested in more in-depth understanding of these issues which are defining our times.



To: Ilaine who wrote (44765)9/17/2002 10:46:56 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
<Was he lying then, or is he lying now? >

does it have to be an either/or ? cant it be yes to both ?



To: Ilaine who wrote (44765)9/17/2002 11:12:51 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Was he lying then, or is he lying now

How do you say lying, politely?
usatoday.com

The Bush administration is expanding on and in some cases contradicting U.S. intelligence reports in making the case for an invasion of Iraq

TP