SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dave Gore's Trades That Make Sense -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: acuransx_2000 who wrote (12337)9/17/2002 1:03:57 PM
From: DELT1970  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16631
 
Are you making the same demands of A.G. Edwards and several other analysts who had similar ratings and made bullish remarks up to the collapse of ESST? Get real! Pay attention to Fulcrum. I have learned the hard way with Fulcrum.



To: acuransx_2000 who wrote (12337)9/17/2002 4:22:02 PM
From: islug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 16631
 
acuransx- Based upon all publicly available data and the companies own guidance ESST did appear to be a good buy. If you were warning before the bomb dropped it would seem that you must have had access to inside information. If so, did you trade on that information?



To: acuransx_2000 who wrote (12337)9/17/2002 6:17:14 PM
From: Dave Gore  Respond to of 16631
 
Well, ACU, let me say just this. This is not a thread that "buys and holds" stocks in this environment, so you apparently didn't even follow the ODOD's or ODOW trades that many of us have been talking about. Very few on this thread even hold stocks overnight.

I am sorry if you lost money on ACF or ESST, but it's a learning lesson for you. Fundamentals do change, don't they? If you don't understand that, you shouldn't be investing or trading.