Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: larry who wrote (61296)	9/17/2002 4:06:13 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77399

LOL. Everyone underestimates Bush. I think that's his biggest strength. I personally feel like he has been highly effective. Because everyone underestimates him, he has the advantage of being unpredictable. I'm believe that they have thought this out better than the everyday person. I think they are using the leverage the U.S. has now to solve some of the problems that have been dogging us for a long time. Iraq has been one of those problems. Alot of folks think that weapons inspections will do the trick. I don't belive so. Instead, I equate Saddam to a cancerous tumor. If a person has a tumor in a major organ and some of the cancer has spread to other parts of the body, do you just remove the cancer in the other places, or do you remove the tumor as well? I'd say remove all the cancer and the tumor as well. That way, you have the best chance of solving the problem. Saddam has been a destabilizer for a long time. Let's not even get started on mentioning the long list of atrocities he's directly responsible for and his unproved but highly probable links to Al Qaeda and other terrorist organization (in fact, his links to Palestinian suicide bombers have been proven without a doubt). So, I say we go for it. Problem is that it will hit our economy. How much and when is the real question.