Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1031)	9/17/2002 1:59:20 PM
From: bramble88	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 57110

Jorj, I'm thinking the same thing. Stole your previous idea and bought QLGC at 30.55 for a quick bounce.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1031)	9/17/2002 2:01:20 PM
From: AugustWest	Respond to of 57110

damn I lowered my stop on qlgc and it just took me out. Made almost 2 bucks on it though today I'd be hard pressed to find a legit complaint. Oh wait It's Canada's fault,I forgot<G>

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1031)	9/17/2002 2:03:27 PM
From: stomper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

Whither "unfettered access"? -g-...shocking: Iraq piece from London's Evening Standard 9/17/02 12:14 PM EDT From the Evening Standard, the following blurb suggests that the Iraqi offer is not, in fact, unconditional. The Standard said that Iraq was only prepared to allow weapons inspectors to visit military sites, which would leave open the possibility of Iraq concealing weapons at civilian sites. The Standard said the revelation came from London ambassador of the Arab League, Ali Muhsen Hamid, which brokered the deal in the first place. Ali Muhsen Hamid was quoted as saying, "We support anywhere, any military site (for inspections), but not as some people have suggested for inspections against hospitals, against schools."