Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (297565)	9/18/2002 8:30:35 AM
From: abbagrace	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

At least I admitted making a "broad statement", that's more than I hear from you. I'm pretty new to this and I'll try not to do that again. You want to start specifying which "rights" you lose when you are arrested .................... that discussion can go on forever !! The first thing to understand here in this kind of discussion is that when you start making a list it (the list) will ALWAYS be too short. There will always be something else that could be added. You are the one that JUMPED out and said that people lose ALL their "rights". The fact is, as soon as you are stopped by an officer of the law, for any reason, your life has been interrupted. Where it goes from there depends a lot on what you've done and how you react, but you start loosing some of your "rights" from that point on. If you are wanting to follow that process all the way, to track what rights you give up by breaking the law ............ have at it, but all along the way you are loosing rights. That's the price of breaking laws.

To: LPS5 who wrote (297565)	9/18/2002 3:40:27 PM
From: abbagrace	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

To:abbagrace who wrote (297542) From: LPS5 Tuesday, Sep 17, 2002 7:51 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 297874 Ok, so that was a pretty broad statement. I'm glad to hear you say that. That's what caught my eye. That is just the way it the law is supposed to work. That's pretty "broad" a statement, too. Are you suggesting that the Constitution intends for people under arrest to lose "all" of their rights? ***************** This is where You JUMPED out there and said that people under arrest lose "all" of their rights. This is not what I was saying and I think anyone that has a brain at all would know better than that !! BTW, yes, I think in some of my post I did get you and Raybo mixed up.