SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (44955)9/17/2002 10:25:07 PM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Tit for Tat" ? reminds me of another saying :
"An eye for an eye makes the world go blind
- MK Gandhi"



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (44955)9/17/2002 10:28:59 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
debka's analysis of Iraq:

Notwithstanding the poor psychological profiles often painted for him, Saddam Hussein is above all a realist. He is also deeply influenced by Muslim military thinking which holds that, when a Muslim general runs into an unbroken wall of resistance that he cannot overcome, it is his duty to effect a tactical retreat. At the first crack in the wall, however, he is bound to resume his attack. This tenet explains why, after four years of fighting off the return of the arms inspectors tooth and nail, Saddam abruptly relented. He did so when he ran into the unbroken wall of the George Bush’s determination. Meanwhile, he is wily enough to appreciate that the palaver over conditions for the arms inspectors to return to Iraq will give him time enough to hide his forbidden weapons and equipment – either in the country or across the border, until the heat dies down, possibly even to Iran. When the inspectors have finished their task or had enough, he will bring the equipment back and resume full production of weapons of mass destruction, just as he did the moment he saw the backs of the arms inspectors in 1998.

...Saddam therefore hopes against hope that he too will survive the mighty American war machine if he acts prudently.

What he has succeeded in doing by his volte face on the UN arms inspectors is to throw in doubt UN endorsement for US military action. But even if the security council adopts the Russian view and sends the inspectors back, the Americans will almost certainly press ahead with the campaign they have begun. It is clear to Washington that the Russians, like the Saudis and French, are not seriously intent on holding the Americans back, but rather trying to get them over a barrel on the post-war share-out of the spoils of victory. The name of this game is oil.

So, while the haggling centers on the conditions under which an American offensive against Baghdad is permissible, no one lifts a finger, including Saddam, to stop US and British warplanes from destroying one by one Iraq’s air force and air defenses command and control centers – an operation that DEBKAfile first began tracking in early August and which US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld confirmed on Monday September 16. The US-led air force is also systematically wiping out the command and communications centers of Iraq’s missile units and its air fleet for delivering chemical and biological warfare materials.

These raids answer only one description: acts of war. The same term applies to the buildup of US, British, Turkish and Jordanian special forces in northern and western Iraq, and their advance up to the hills overlooking the two northern oil cities of Mosul and Kirkuk. The diplomatic fur may continue to fly, but so too will the military operations.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (44955)9/17/2002 10:32:07 PM
From: SirRealist  Respond to of 281500
 
I would not be surprised to see a rash of suspect actions occur. Whether they prove to be extremists on one side or the other.

If a biased public will believe the WTC/Pentagon attacks to be a Zionist/US conspiracy (or, conversely, believe that all Palestinians are as bad as their leaders, or all Arabs, or all Muslims), then such bias will be exploited.

In general, though, I give Israel high marks for exposing and prosecuting its extremists. I'm not as certain its as rigorous at ferreting out rogue soldiers, but it's hard for anyone to be perfect in that regard.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (44955)9/18/2002 1:50:13 AM
From: Bilow  Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Nadine Carroll; Re: "Yeah, the Israelis should pin medals on them -- then they'd be just like the Palestinians."

Nah, what the Palestinians should do in response is blow up or bulldoze their houses, kill them while pretending to try to capture them, and then exile their relatives.

-- Carl