SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rich4eagle who wrote (297623)9/18/2002 12:42:05 AM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Oh, more slander, eh? Yup. And of course, you won't apologize. By the by, I think it is surely illogical to boastfully state "I am always totally logical."

Dan B



To: rich4eagle who wrote (297623)9/18/2002 12:53:04 AM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
I have noticed that you claim that all who disagree with you want to murder a lot of people. That is not only offensive, it is quite immature.



To: rich4eagle who wrote (297623)9/18/2002 1:03:15 AM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
This is the utterly fallacious argument being used to support an attack on Iraq:

""The president thinks it's better to do this sooner rather than later," Rice said on CNN's "Late Edition." "I don't think anyone wants to wait for the 100 percent surety that [Hussein] has a weapon of mass destruction that can reach the United States, because the only time we may be 100 percent sure is when something lands on our territory."

First of all there's not even 10% surety at present.
Secondly, "...when something lands on our territory." is NOT the "only time we may be 100% sure." That statement is a bald-faced lie.
Thirdy, WHERE THE FRICK DOES THE IDEA THAT IRAQ IS POISED TO ATTACK THE UNITED STATES COME FROM???? huh???? HELLOOOOO!!!! THEY'RE MAKING IT UP OUT OF THIN AIR!!!
and the goofy warmongers on this thread actually fall for it!!