To: Richnorth who wrote (89731 ) 9/18/2002 10:46:02 AM From: E. Charters Respond to of 116815 The Bolshoi was a good ballet company in the old days. It has fallen on hard times of late. Sol Hurok used to bring these people into Canada to entertain in the 50's and 60's. I don't believe that they could go to the States at that time. We also used to get the Red Army Chorus, and lots of B Russian Hockey players who played our junior A teams. The Russians would generally outshoot our players, about 3 to 5 to one, and the score usually ended up looking like basketball games, at least on one side and jai-alai scores on the other. I remember noticing that the Russian players were usually taller than our players and obviously in much better shape. In fact they were in frighteningly good shape. I don't recall seeing people as lithe and muscular as these fellows before or since. I inquired about this of some coaches and those in the know told me that the Russians all played another sport at the same level as they played hockey in the off season, and this was usually soccer, but could have been swimming or canoeing. Their players could play all 3 periods on one line without a break, and our players had to have line changes every 3 to 5 minutes to keep up with them.
I was in in canoeing since 1952. Since my father was an olympic medallist whose style had influenced the Russian canoeists, who by then were leading the world, I was interested in their attitude and application to the sport. I found studies that they had done in Hungary on 50,000 junior canoeists from one canoe club. A junior may be any age here, and is just a category of races won. The Russian and Hungarian Sports federations had measured oxygen uptake, intramuscular fat, muscle type, limb length, years experience, miles trained, heart wall thickness, and lung capacity of every canoeist throughout their career. They did this in order to categorize the relative amount of endurance, muscle resiliency, and explosive muscle strength that was required to compete in various canoe races of different classes and lengths. This was to guide athletic selection and training methods for the sport.
In all of North America in the past 100 years, we don't have 50,000 athletes in all sports at all levels, let alone 50,000 canoeists. We did not possess such detailed data on even one of them, nor did we have one coach who had the faintest idea it might be important to know such things. The true meaning of amateurism could not be more clearly seen from this. We were amateurish in that our attitude was appalingly ignorant and would probably never change. The gap of attitude, dedication, and interest in amateur sport was just too large to overcome in North America. Our idea was to overcoach a few promising athletes selected by scouts from the meagre few, and push them with drugs and government money as showpieces to win at a few international races. If the Soviet Bloc athlete ever lost a race to one of our athletes, it is just as likely any one of 30 others from his own country could have beaten him on that day too. And for the most part, any of 2 to 3 thousand of athletes from his country could beat our whole team in successive heats, in most sports at any distance.
I came to the conclusion that the Russians could be beaten, since we had their information for free and only had to train one winner with the right technique, not 50,000. Of course this sort of pipe dream was never going to come true so it got shelved in the natural process of things.
The amazing thing is the Soviets gained their superiority, in part by imitating Canadian and US athletes from the 1920's and 1930's.
EC<:-}