Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (58608)	9/18/2002 12:26:58 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Sure, they try to rationalize. However, they are often unsuccessful, except in the sense of continuing to see- saw around inconclusive arguments. I agree that there is a difference between rules as generalities and what is right under circumstances, and that is the entering wedge of an honest moral dilemma, as we entertain the possibility that that we can set aside the rule in the instance. But when we choose without having resolved the dilemma, and choose to "follow our bliss", we give up the protection of conscience, and leave ourselves exposed to the possibility of having diminished the standards by which we hope to live. For example, there are possible justifications for lying, but the lower you set the bar, the closer you become to just being a liar. The bar should be set high, even if sometimes you might legitimately spare yourself grief. Similarly, I go out of my way to hold back on losing my temper, because I would rather suffer some abuse than become an abuser. (I will, however, not put up with ANYthing). Of course, there is a class of things where drawing the line matters more than the specific transgression, as in the examples I gave, so that the main issue is the development of habits amounting to character. On the other hand, there are things sufficiently momentous that I would not like at all to be on the wrong side, as, for example, homicide. I would hope that someone in conflict about killing, not clearly justified by circumstance, would choose not to do it. The consequences of error are too large, and there are no good take backs......