Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (45233)	9/18/2002 9:50:52 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hi kumar_rangan; Re: "corroborate it / give a link" If you swear to me that you think that CobaltBlue is an expert on modern maritime practices and understands the government regulations that determine when the DoD is and is not allowed to use foreign carriers, well, then, I'll *think* about *maybe* digging up the link that proves that cost is considered. But Jesus Weeps! How much time do you think I have on my hands? It's like shouting down a well. -- Carl P.S. Ah what the hell. Read here, for example: The Cargo Preference Act of 1904 (1904 Act) requires all items procured for or owned by U.S. military departments and defense agencies be carried exclusively (100 percent) on U.S.-flag vessels available at rates that are not excessive or otherwise unreasonable. These cargoes are generated primarily by DOD contracts with domestic and foreign contractors. Cargo preference applies not only to the end product, but also to component parts. marad.dot.gov