SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (66014)9/19/2002 10:23:38 AM
From: BWAC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
"Fool me once, er ah err er eh eh......dont't fool me again"

Presidente Confusedious



To: michael97123 who wrote (66014)9/19/2002 10:28:45 AM
From: Cary Salsberg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
There are NO Iraq supporters on this thread, in the sense of Saddam supporters. I think we are all talking about how to prevent innocent people from suffering at the hands of evil. Warfare is usually not the best way to accomplish that goal. In the case of Saddam, it would be better to cut off all oil exports, even the "humanitarian" component, than to launch an invasion.



To: michael97123 who wrote (66014)9/19/2002 10:42:53 AM
From: BWAC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
One further, Your WPM fears. You should be more fearful of some fringe psycho with no country, no land, no people to defend using one of these; than of a physical country using one it already has.

You should be more fearful that once one is used, that one will be used in retaliation. Then What?

Also? Define Mass Destruction?

If a cluster bomb is dropped on your head. Was some very important Mass destructed?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News