SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Siebel Systems (SEBL) - strong buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gh who wrote (6321)9/20/2002 11:07:40 AM
From: straight life  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6974
 
"10:28AM Siebel Systems under pressure on cautious Bear Stearns note (SEBL) 6.72 -0.79: Bear Stearns note says SEBL may be able to "scrape the low end of the range" for license revs; also says "without a meaningful pickup in demand for CRM, Siebel will have to drive new product initiatives to counter eroding prices and deal flow for its core products." " Briefing.com



To: gh who wrote (6321)9/20/2002 11:13:19 AM
From: Clappy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6974
 
Has anyone noticed SEBL's declining share price this morning? According to DATEK, shares were temporarily halted. Is there any news? Any TAers out there with a perspective on share price?

The drop caught my eye.

It appears to be trading on my Datek screen. I didn't notice it getting halted.

Possibly fallout due to EDS? Or tripple witch games?
Another round of analyst comments to go through?...

TA wise, we could use a nice end of day save to get us to finish above 7.43ish. Otherwise we are floating on thin air.

I bought some SEBL this morning. Hopefully it was not a mistake.

This oversold market has to bounce eventually...

<EDIT: Just saw the Bear Stearns comment>



To: gh who wrote (6321)9/24/2002 5:49:08 PM
From: Davy Crockett  Respond to of 6974
 
nope



To: gh who wrote (6321)9/24/2002 5:49:57 PM
From: Davy Crockett  Respond to of 6974
 
yep TA wise... possible bottoming action BWDIK

BUT not resolved yet IMO