Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SafetyAgentMan who wrote (10192)	9/20/2002 6:10:09 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10852

that would explain the action. you think this thing has much time left <g> looks pretty grim, but in such a weird way.

To: SafetyAgentMan who wrote (10192)	9/20/2002 11:21:37 PM
From: ebg51	Respond to of 10852

Also I heard at the time 2 weeks ago that BA was going to build the sat and Measat would not have to pay anything until it was in orbit. But my contact was not sure about that one so I didn't say anything at the time.

To: SafetyAgentMan who wrote (10192)	9/23/2002 7:06:15 AM
From: Jeff Vayda	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10852

Safety: BA to supply F-16's through GD? Does not make sense to me. Why would Boeing offer a Lockheed product? They might offer to buy 16s and replace then with Boeing products (15 or 18s). Fighters are a much better business than satellites - especially to countries where you can sell infrastructure support. Both the sat and the fighters have to be approved through US Govt channels, so a new fighter offer is beyond Boeing's ability to promise. They certainly would not champion Lockheed's planes through Congress. Jeff Vayda