SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Harvey Allen who wrote (88383)9/20/2002 10:07:16 PM
From: h0dbRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"he XP 1600+'s being sold now in the $50. range all are 166MHz bus parts. They do very well 10.5 X 166Mhz = 1750MHz most at default voltage. The AGOIA's of week 13 2002 are especially good running 10.5 X 174MHz and up. It is as if AMD decided to mark their entire output XP 1600+."

That is just wrong; they are spec'd as 133/266MHz bus parts. They may indeed work at 166Mhz, but that is an overclock not supported by AMD or any OEM.

From AMD's Athlon XP Product Brief:

amd.com

"# Advanced 266MHz Front-Side Bus"

From AMD's architecture overview:

amd.com

"266MHz AMD Athlon™ XP processor system bus enables excellent system bandwidth for data movement-intensive applications"

If you look at the overclockers database here:

overclockers.cssftware.com

You will see that the average overclock of the XP 1600+ (a 1400MHz part) at default voltage (1.75V) with air cooling is more typically in the 1533MHz to 1600MHz range. I typing this on a PC with one inside it running at 1600MHz,which is as high as I could push it at 1.85V and good air cooling.



To: Harvey Allen who wrote (88383)9/21/2002 12:31:50 AM
From: Jim McMannisRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
I have a 1600+ AGOIA and it won't even post at 166 MHz bus.
When I kick it back to 150 it gets some kind of checksum error on the splash screen. The RAM PC2100 Micron. Maybe the RAM can't handle it?