SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Harvey Allen who wrote (88387)9/20/2002 11:26:00 PM
From: h0dbRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Harvey, I think that's likely, esp. since the first T-bred (.13-um-process) parts didn't have much headroom, so bin splits could have left them with quite a few parts rated at 2100+ and below. If you want to know if some 1600+ parts are actually T-breds in disguise, a glance at the package would tell you; t-bred cores are tiny even compared to Palominos.



To: Harvey Allen who wrote (88387)9/20/2002 11:33:27 PM
From: ptannerRespond to of 275872
 
Harvey, re: "There was a production run of .18 XP 2200's and a decision was made not to extend the line to that speed so all were marked and sold as XP 1600+."

Why would they have to mark them at the lowest speed? If they were ok for 2200+ but AMD didn't want to release 0.18 2200+ then they should be just fine for 2100+ (etc) and have greater value.

Regardless, it sounds like you got a very nice OC chip.

-PT


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News