Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4282)	9/21/2002 2:02:36 AM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

The theory which you presented was that if you own a trust, and have money to invest, you should always buy more of that particular trust. I repeat, if this theory is correct, why do you not just own one trust? Simple question. Let's hear an answer. ----- You sure like to put your own words into someones else explaination or strategy. Look to the following from previous posting Message 18017968 and from that"""Simple fact is different trusts offer differences which are a value in any good portfolio. Some are more oil than gas. Some heavy oil some light oil. Some real estate some pet food. That you miss another basic investing concept shows how much you know and how well you do.""""""" You Lorne can't even grasp the most basic of investing concepts ----------- ----- Further to that would be the differing structures to each, areas, focus, management, etc -----------

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4282)	9/21/2002 2:46:47 AM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

Nothing to do with "cycling", dummy. The theory which you presented was that if you own a trust, and have money to invest, you should always buy more of that particular trust. I repeat, if this theory is correct, why do you not just own one trust? Simple question. Let's hear an answer. ------ So instead of providing us all with any sort of real data. AS IS USUAL. (As I did in the past posts using the real trust trading numbers from PWI and into PVE and AY which clearly showed the merits of the strategy in that case) And this after your chest thumping of how you were going to find those past posts and show it was wrong even if it took you days. """"YOU BACKED OUT OF THAT PRETTY QUICKLY""""". Now your attack strategy is to never mind the data lets just focus on the number of trusts held 1 or more. Thats really a desperate attempt on your part. AND just as desperate as saying Worlcom and trusts are one in the same. EACH OF YOUR ATTEMPTS AT COUNTERS JUST KEEP GETTING MORE AND MORE REDICULOUS . And their seen by joe average trust investor for just what they are---- ------ Another case previous case was for LUS. Remember how you said that my buying at $8 initially and selling at $4 meant a loss of 50%. You conveniently left out the fact (as always) that I accumulated much at under $1 ($0.70). In that post when I mentioned that for those at a $1 (for simple ex) meant a gain from those of 400%. And so net that left me with 400% - 50% or 350%. Now when I asked for you to show anything at the time that someone could have switched into to beat that. YOU RAN AWAY. AS YOU ALWAYS RUN AWAY FROM FACTS LIKE THAT. ----------------- ------- And from the previously referenced post """And since you are so up on my strategy please indicate where I or IT has stated anything about the number of trusts that can be held or accumulated""""------------- Like to see that documented past post of mine?????? But like so many cases its "place your own words into it" and then try to discredit those words. Trouble is that that is just way too easy to show.------- ONCE AGAIN THANKS FOR THE AMMO ------