SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (45801)9/21/2002 7:05:31 AM
From: Rascal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Thanks for the article about Scott Ritter.

Several have been posted here lately.

It basically says everything we all know and has a WSJ perspective.

There is an ability to parse words and it is tempting to use the "deposition approach" to discredit someone and then state that one change of position makes a person a pathological liar or a traitor.

I noticed yesterday the major newsbroadcast showed a clip of GWBush from the campaign stating how he would never support nation building and "The US had to be humble.", "We cannot go into another country and tell them how to do things." They juxtapositioned these clips with their reporting of the new Preemptive Foreign Policy.

I could write an article about him with the Wall Street Journal parsing and slant and bring up the Carlyle Group and the Halliburton COmpany building the infrastructure in Afghanistan as a reason.

That's what makes a market, the world go round, the need for and open mind and critical thinking.

It's good to have a place to play theses things out.

Rascal



To: LindyBill who wrote (45801)9/21/2002 10:49:09 AM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 281500
 
BAGHDAD JANE
Ritter of Arabia
How did a tough Marine become an apologist for Saddam Hussein?


That has to be from the op ed page of the WSJ. Typical headline with the classic, "how often do you beat your wife" statement.