Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epsteinbd who wrote (45889)	9/21/2002 2:02:51 PM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Your logic is perfect. Everywhere you have typed Irak below substitute Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, North Korea. By focusing on Iraq only, the argument is flawed in its urgency. "Is the top Washington Administration wrong by thinking that, if there remains a governing body in a country that harbors WMD (Irak), and could have reasons to associate, even indirectly, with extremists Muslims, then it's better to take that gov out and do your US best to try to "democratise" the country the way you US used to do (Irak rich enough to succeed, fortunately); the alternative being : giving the "bad guys" time to organise and to LEARN!, being obviously negative."