SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4309)9/21/2002 9:44:22 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11633
 
Nothing wrong with that theory. In fact as I've said before your investment approach is better than most. Your problem is that you are an egotistical jerk, who thinks that your approach is the ONLY approach.

------- Mine is the ONLY approach that can be verified with the data and tested. Quite simply yours can't. And you lie about your successes as I showed. If thats not the case then post your method and lets test it out. YOU NEVER HAVE TO ANYONE. AND OTHERS HAVE ASKED. YOU DON'T OR CAN'T DELIVER -------

The theory you posted to Scott, however, is not the theory you posted in #3560.

------- ITS ALL ONE IN THE SAME. YOU JUST EDIT OUT A SINGLE PART OF IT TO TRY TO DISCREDIT IT. ---------

In that post you stated that you should ALWAYS buy what you already own. That statement is patently ridiculous, and you know it.

------ THEN SHOW SOME REAL TRUST TRADING NUMBERS THAT I CAN'T SO EASILY DISPUTE WITH FACT.------
------ AND YET YOU STILL HAVE NOT PRESENTED ANYTHING TO SUPPORT YOUR CLAIM THAT ONE COULD HAVE BOUGHT ANOTHER TRUST (WHICH ONE????) TO BEAT LUS's NET RETURN. AGAIN WHERE IS IT. All you have are edited word games. PUT UP>!!!!!!!!! IF YOU REFUSE THAN THAT ANSWERS IT ALL TO EVERYONES SATISFACTION. ----

Your ego however prevents you from ever acknowledging any error. So you've spent the last 2 hours defending the indefensible. Keep trying, if you wish. I enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself.

---- THERES NO ERROR. YOU WANT TO FOCUS ON ONE SMALL EDITED PART TO DISCREDIT THE WHOLE. DOESN'T WORK ITS JUST WORD GAMES. THE ONLY FOOL IS THE ONE WHO REFUSES TO PUT UP HIS DATA. AND THATS YOU. """"SO PUT IT UP"""""""". Thats 5 or 6 times asking now. And still its no show for you. Thats just embarrassing for you.-------



To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4309)9/21/2002 10:09:46 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11633
 
That statement is patently ridiculous, and you know it.

------ Wonder how many debates have been won with no to little real data like Lornes side. With that side saying that that is just patently rediculous and you on the other side know it. Therefore the debate is over and I (LORNE) am the winner YIPPEE YIPPIEE. NOT A SINGLE ONE. LORNE YOU WOULD BE LAUGHED OFF THE DEBATE STAGE. LIKE YOUR BEING LAUGHED AT HERE. ------------