Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (46027)	9/22/2002 9:36:15 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Conflation, Nadine. There is no doubt the nature of the threat has changed since 9-11. But that is a threat from Al Q, not from nation states. The Bush folk still have not offered serious arguments and evidence why they think the US should invade Iraq to stop Al Q. They have not been able to link Al Q via Atta, though they must have tried mightily. They look sideways, almost embarrassed, everytime a spokesperson says Saddam is "harboring" Al Q as if they know they have no evidence he is harboring any more than any other country in which Al Q cells live.