Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (7028)	9/22/2002 3:13:38 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 89467

Duray's approach will ensure that more "WTC"s come down. Thousands of people will be within them — be it perhaps Sears Tower, Empire State Building, World's Biggest Ball of Twine in Ottuma, Iowa, etc... He chastises the younger Bush for being proactive, whilst applying equal blame to the elder Bush, a relatively reactive figure in comparison. Reactive didn't accomplish much. Reactivist policy kept Saddam in power with ability to threaten. Same reactive policy guided our bureaucratics towards ignoring signs that eliminated those two big towers with real people inside. Perhaps Ray's best argument should be that all-inclusive, dual-sided nuclear strikes ought to end this discussion. To be certain, no one would be alive enough to point out his fallacy.