Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjkirk who wrote (7046)	9/22/2002 2:35:27 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Hayes writes for the right wing Weekly Standard and has his own agenda... I wouldn't trust much of what he says. He doesn't like Ritter's message so he's going after the messenger.

To: jjkirk who wrote (7046)	9/22/2002 2:40:43 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

You are a most remarkably silly goose, Not only did Jane Fonda expose the ugly and corrupt underbelly of American capitalism, now Scott Ritter does the same. How much are you being paid to lie to this thread about what is going on? You are obviously on somebody's payroll. Who pays you? Why do you lie? Why are you so afraid of the truth? I'm a patient patriot. Take your time getting in touch with your handlers about how to deal with this distraction. Duray

To: jjkirk who wrote (7046)	9/22/2002 10:48:11 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

jjkirk, While I'd seen Mr Ritter defend his positions several times on Television, where his detractors had been armed with limited quotes of him which he'd been able to declare he still stands behind still while perhaps sounding reasonable, the information in the article you posted truly makes the situation clear: something is amiss with Mr. Ritter's logic today, IMO. Thanks or posting that one. I see Ray Duray has responded with generalities of puffery and pomp, no beef. Raider Ray(TM-NOT, LOL), seldom attempts to respond to information he doesn't know how to counter. Hell, he'd have to actually say "I don't know how to top those arguments," which would involve something beyond him, i.e. considering changing his mind when evidence dictates. Freedom Works, Dan B.