Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (3084)	9/22/2002 9:10:18 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 8273

Get it straight buddy! This is your last warning! It's seven kilometres of gold, not a mile of gold, in fpr.v (Foxpoint) "These properties, which have historically produced 22 million ounces of gold, extend over seven kilometres, and from west to east include Macassa, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore and Wright-Hargreaves." Did you see the assays in that drilling? Oh my gawd! I thought they were talking GRAMS per ton, not ounces per ton. There must be some kind of mistake. If those assays are correct, it is no wonder there was a gold rush in Kirkland Lake back in the 20's.. We assayed an old KL property for Karl Forbes just north of the main break and the best we saw was one ounce per ton. EC<:-}

To: marcos who wrote (3084)	9/22/2002 11:33:01 AM
From: Davy Crockett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8273

<<think what they could do now, if they still had the twenty millions and they'd stayed in resources ... >> Good point! Talk about thowing away buckets of cash.... Regrards, PEter