Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Silver prices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Canuck Dave who wrote (5804)	9/22/2002 11:58:05 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8010

> What tweaked your funnybone? Must have been the word "vexes" as in "supply-demand balance in the silver realm vexes the true believers" > In other words, the silver deficit (102M) would be much larger if you didn't include the Chinese numbers (74M). Nothing really new there ;) If one ignores one of the most significant factors in the silver markets over the last 3-4 years, one might be able to come to any conclusion. > But the fact remains that demand and supply are in balance despite the implied disinvestment. End of story. Bingo ! Supply = Demand, even if one doesn't really like some of the sources of the supply. Even if you try to ignore the Chinese, they still exist.