SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (46325)9/23/2002 7:54:34 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Trying to get the BBC to report the Middle East news a little more evenly.

"Rots of Ruck," as our Asians say in Hawaii! I would have a tough time at a dinner conversation in Europe, based on this column. Elliot Cohen, in his conversation with Brian Lamb on "Book Notes" yesterday, said he considered the Foreign Press "impossible" on the subject of this country. Said that the State Department needed to spend a lot of time giving them interviews to try to correct the bias. My thought when he said that was, "Hell, they probably agree with the Foreign Press!"

His view of our major media was that the TV only reported the "Buzz." He felt the "Washington Post" was a little to the "Right" on the editorial page, and was objective on the news pages. He felt the "New York Times" was "Dovish" on both their Editorial and News pages. He thought that they had misrepresented Kissinger's views.

This "The Jews and the CIA did it," is so typical of overseas. We only hear it here from the Neo Nazi's, although I suspect it is not too far under the surface with some of our normal anti-semites and "loonies."



To: maceng2 who wrote (46325)9/23/2002 7:52:01 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
I'm doing my little bit. Trying to get the BBC to report the Middle East news a little more evenly. i.e. not so anti Israel and anti American

Keep up the good fight, PB. It's appreciated.

BTW, did you see this charming program John Pilger launched on ITV1 on Yom Kippur, to add more insult to insult?

Dear HonestReporting Member,

On Sept. 16, while most of British Jewry was celebrating the Yom Kippur break-fast, Britain's most popular television channel, ITV1, aired a ferociously anti-Israel documentary entitled, "Palestine is Still the Issue." The program was produced by Australian-born John Pilger, a
columnist for the UK Daily Mirror with a 25-year record of anti-Israel activism.

Scant effort was made to provide context, Israeli perspective or even explanation, with Prof. Ilan Pappe used as a token academic Israeli historian. However, Pappe is far from objective, having run for the Knesset on the radical Communist Party ticket, and is disgraced and
discredited in Israel for falsifying historical evidence. Coupled with his post-Modernist perspective and active engagement with Palestinians in an attempt to discredit Zionism, it is unsurprising that Pappe supports Pilger's thesis concerning Israel's fault.

HonestReporting questions not only the biased content of the program (detailed below), but also the decision to broadcast -- on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar -- such a clear affront to the Jewish community.
Furthermore, Pilger's discussion of the program on the Gloria Hunniford chat show (carried on British TV Channel 5) was aired on Yom Kippur afternoon, when few Jews were available to participate.

To accompany the documentary, Pilger also published an article in The Mirror, one of Europe's leading dailies with several million readers. Entitled "Israel's Routine Terrorism," Pilger's article mirrors the gross violations of media objectivity seen in his TV documentary.

Read the Mirror article at:
pilger.carlton.com

Read info on Pilger's documentary at:
johnpilger.com

===== CRITIQUE OF THE DOCUMENTARY ====

From start to finish, Pilger's documentary is a veritable encyclopedia of every anti-Israel canard in existence today:

- Referring to Israel's War of Independence (following Arab refusal to accept the UN partition plan), Pilger's documentary simply stated: "In 1948 the Arab world rose up, when Palestinians were forced to flee from their homes in a blitz of fear and terror." Read carefully: Pilger suggests that the 5-nation Arab attack was in response to Israeli
aggression.

- The Six Day War is described similarly: "In 1967 Palestinians were forced to flee again when Israel occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip, describing it as an act of self defense." Pilger insists that 1967 was simply an Israeli fantasy about Arabs wanting to destroy it.

- Operation Defensive Shield is portrayed as a deliberate attempt to vandalize and destroy Palestinian culture; no mention is made of the wave of suicide bombings that forced Israel to defend itself.

- Pilger suggests that Israel systematically murders Palestinians, claiming that 90% of Palestinians killed are civilians. In fact, scholarly studies show that in the last two years of violence, 39% of Palestinian deaths are "non-combatant" -- versus 79% of Israeli deaths are "non-combatant." (See study at
ict.org.il

- Pilger suggests that the victims of terror are morally equivalent to the terrorist, and asserts that killing a terrorist before he can murder is also "terrorism."

- Pilger decries the inconvenience of IDF checkpoints, but fails to mention that the checkpoints were set up as a response to terrorism. Nor does he mention how the editor of the notoriously anti-Israel Guardian found that the average wait was 20 seconds to pass a checkpoint, with the
soldiers being polite to the Arabs.

- Pilger claims that checkpoints have destroyed the Palestinian economy, while ignoring the fact that violence against Israelis forced the loss of tens of thousands of Palestinian jobs. Pilger also omits mention of the
severe damage to the Palestinian economy due to corruption of Palestinian Authority officials; Arafat's personal wealth has been estimated at $1.3 billion.

- Pilger interviews an Arab couple who claim that their newborn baby died due to alleged IDF harassment at a checkpoint. The woman says: "This is how they treat all Palestinians. I'm sorry to say this, but they would
rather help an animal than an Arab." Pilger offers no counter-claim, and declares that such a story is "typical of the everyday treatment of the Palestinians."

- Pilger characterizes the 1948 refugee issue as "ethnic cleansing."
However, it is a historical fact that most Arabs were persuaded to leave
by Arab leaders who promised to invade and destroy Israel. Time Magazine
(May 3, 1948) reported that "The mass evacuation, prompted partly by fear,
partly by orders of Arab leaders, left the Arab quarter of Haifa a ghost
city... By withdrawing Arab workers, their leaders hoped to paralyze
Haifa."

Pilger of course selectively omits mentioning the equal number of Jewish
refugees who fled from Arab countries, and settled in Israel. He also
omits that in the 1880s there was no native Palestinian population to
displace (as the journal of Mark Twain and other contemporary sources
confirm), except in about 5% of "Palestine." In fact, as is thoroughly
documented in Joan Peters' classic work, "From Time Immemorial" (available
at amazon.com), most Arabs immigrated into "Palestine" after
the Zionist pioneers had worked hard to cultivate land that they had
legally bought from absentee Arab landlords, bringing commerce to the
region.

- Pilger compares Israel's treatment of Arabs like that of apartheid South
Africa. He fails to note, however, that Arabs living under Israeli rule
enjoy a far greater freedom of speech and freedom of the press than do
Arabs living under the PA, and that the first Middle East country to grant
Arab women the right to vote was Israel -- not Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, or
any of the 20 other Arab Middle East states. Nor does Pilger mention how
in much of the Arab world, Jews and other non-Muslims are treated as
second-class citizens (the despised Dhimmi).

- Pilger categorizes at least 3 Israeli prime ministers as "terrorists."

- Pilger claims that "For much of their resistance, the Palestinians have
fought back courageously with slingshots." However, he omits reference to
the Hebron riots of 1929 when 29 Jews were slaughtered. Or the period of
1951-55, when more than 3,000 armed attacks were launched against Israeli
civilians, resulting in the deaths of 922 Israelis and foreign tourists.
Or the Oslo period (1993-2000), when 300 Israelis were murdered by
Palestinian terrorists. (To cite a few of the many historical examples.)

- Pilger accuses the Jewish world of carrying out a conspiracy to
manipulate the non-Jewish world into believing that any criticism of
Israel is "anti-Semitic."

- Pilger complains that Israel is being heavily supplied by America, but
he selectively omits mention that America gives billions of dollars
annually to Arab countries such as Egypt and Jordan.

- For his final thrust, Pilger employs the classic canard of suggesting
that Israel's battle against Palestinian terror is akin to Hitler's
treatment of the Jews. The conclusion of the documentary, to paraphrase
Pilger, is that the world stood silent during the Holocaust -- "will they
stay silent again?"

If you believe that Pilger's documentary is biased, write to:

Email: dutyoffice@carltontv.co.uk
Phone: 020-7240-4000
Fax: 020-7615-1775

Write to:
Carlton Television
101 St Martin's Lane
London WC2N 4AZ

HonestReporting members should note that Pilger's documentary will be
broadcast in Australia on SBS television on October 8th at 8.30 p.m.

Thank you for your ongoing involvement in the battle against media bias.

HonestReporting.com