Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (299408)	9/23/2002 7:58:47 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"tell me what I said in my previous post that was wrong" You said I was "skimming" and taking advantage of "loopholes" to unpatriotically reduce my tax load. As I have said, I actually pay more with the company than if I did not have it, and am paying my full share of taxes. Maybe "skimming" has no negative connotations to you, and you regularly use that word when describing regular lawful business practices. To me "skimming" has definate negative connotations and in most cases (if not all) is illegal. "but don't say you are not taking advantage of a tax loophole to reduce your personal taxes if it is not available to everyone" I am paying myself MORE than I would like, so I am paying MORE personal taxes. Like I said, give me the reason you think I am "skimming" or "loopholing" anything. I pay my FULL SHARE of personal income taxes with NO exemptions that are not available to EVERYONE. To make a charge you need to have evidence. You (like many demos) just have to have personel animosity towards people with viewpoints other than your own.