Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4344)	9/23/2002 8:53:19 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

Interesting that for the last 8 months you've been flapping your big hole about how I made a mistake in selling PWI and switching to another trust. -------- It was a mistake because you didn't have to do it. PETER 6 LORNE 0 That says it all loser------ Now that the numbers prove conclusively that this was the right thing to do, you suddenly claim that this is not your theory. ------ Hardly conclusively how do the numbers support you when clearly buying more at lower prices lowering the average cost base wins out and wins out each time (6). AS PER ALL MY AND YOUR OWN EXAMPLES. YOUR IN TOTAL DENIAL OF THE FACTS AND DATA.------------------- ------ Your the one that posted that my theory said lower your cost base. BUY MORE AT LOWER PRICES. You showed it from one of my past posts. Harped on it, again and again. Now when I show the numbers for lowering the cost base (BUYING MORE) for PWI when it fell and recovered back up beats your switching (13.5% to your 9%) As well as for in all 6 instances LUS, MXT, NCF, ERF, NAE, PWI. Suddenly you cry that I can't use it. WHY??????????? BECAUSE IT JUST SHOWS HOW WRONG YOU ARE. READ THE EVIDENCE AND WEEP. ----------- You know bloody well that when I sold PWI your argument had nothing to do with buying MORE shares of PWI - it had to do with switching from PWI to another trust. --------- The argument you made was against my theory. The theory states quite clearly that you lower the average cost base and you do that by buying more at lower prices. You showed that from my post. Now all of sudden you don't want to acknowledge it because I used it to prove that switching doesnt work like you claim. The time and effort and expense of doing the switching simply does not provide a better return period. ALL 6 cases showed that. You want more. SURELY PETER 6 LORNE 0 is embarrasing enough for you. ----------- ZERO ZERO ZERO ---------- Your such a sore loser its pathetic. ----- I'll link a whole bunch of your wacko posts in this regard as soon as I get a chance. ----- I already posted past posts from the last months like you asked all saying that I accumulate on weakness more lowering my cost base. BY BUYING AT LOWER PRICES Just like the theory said. Just like I do. YOU SAID THERE WERE NONE. YOUR A SORE LOSER LIAR. And I clearly benefit when the unit prices rise because they do that rising over and over again. Thats the gravy of the strategy. The meat is the high monthly income I get each and every month , month after month, year after year. And accumulating means I get more and more of it each time. With the added benefit of that gravy (rise above my average cost base)------ ------- I linked a post telling of using the strategy/theory to increase my investment line of credit. Taking my results straight to the bank each quarter. TRY TAKING YOUR UNDOCUMENTED BUYS AND DOING THE SAME> THEY WOULD GET A REAL LAUGH OUT OF THAT. THEY WOULD ASK LIKE WE ALL HAVE ASKED HERE. WHAT IS YOUR STRATEGY? WHAT IS THE MATH OF IT? WHAT ARE THE DOCUMENTED RESULTS? They like all here have gotten would be a no show from you. JUST CLAIMS WITH NOT ONE BIT OF FACT OR DATA TO BACK THAT UP--------------- YOUR JUST A SORE LOSER TRADER ---------- TOOOO BAAAD FOR YOU.------------ ------- You have expended here a great deal of effort and you still have not proved that switching works well enough. If you have this much time to waste on such a foolish attempt. THEN WHY IS IT THAT YOU HAVE NO TIME TO SHOW BILL WHAT HE REQUESTED ,PAST DATA FOR DIVIDEND STRIPPING THAT SHOWS IT WORKS AND WORKS WELL ENOUGH TO BE WORTH THE EFFORT FOR GLH.UN. OR HOW ABOUT YOU ANSWER RUSSETTS REQUEST TO TRADERS "TO SHOW US ALL HOW IT IS DONE" "" SO THEY CAN LEARN FROM IT"" YOU WONT FOR EITHER OF THOSE BUT YOU WILL DO THIS LAME EFFORT OF YOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS ALL SHOWS HOW MUCH YOU WANT TO HELP PEOPLE HERE. AND HOW REALLY UNSUPERIOR YOU AND YOUR RESULTS REALLY ARE.------------------

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (4344)	9/23/2002 9:20:16 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11633

You know bloody well that when I sold PWI your argument had nothing to do with buying MORE shares of PWI ------ I already linked to that past post. Where my examples from that time have me (P) buying units at lower prices lowering my cost base. (AS PER THE THEORY OF MINE YOU YOURSELF POSTED) Then I compare those results to some one (L) who sells out at a loss and goes into another trust. P BEATS L PERIOD. THATS WHAT THE NUMBERS SHOWED BACK THEN ITS ALL A MATTER OF RECORD AND DOCUMENTED --------------- - it had to do with switching from PWI to another trust. ---- As above it has to do with me on the one side buying more at lower prices lowering my cost base and you on the other side taking a loss and switching to another trust. YOU WANT TO CHANGE MY SIDE AND WHAT I REALLY DO JUST SO YOU CAN WIN. CANT DO THAT. SO YOU LOSE PERIOD. READ IT AND WEEP. YOUR SUCH A SORE LOSER. ------ I'll link a whole bunch of your wacko posts in this regard as soon as I get a chance. ----- SURE WASTE THE TIME INSTEAD OF HELPING OTHERS HERE OR SHOWING THE OTHERS WHAT THEY REALLY WANT FROM YOU. A METHOD MATH THEY CAN TEST FOR THEMSELVES. PROVIDE THEM THAT AND THEY CAN DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES. UNTIL YOU DO YOUR JUST A SORE LOSER WITH AN AXE TO GRIND. ALL YOU'LL SHOW IS THAT I DO AS I SAID ACCUMULATE ON WEAKNESS BUYING MORE LOWERING MY AVERAGE COST AND BENEFITTING GREATLY FROM HIGH INCOME EACH MONTH AND RISES TO AND OVER MY AVERAGE COST BASE WHEN THEY COME ALONG OVER AND OVER AGAIN-------------------