Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (299540)	9/24/2002 12:21:18 AM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The question is raised on the floor, do I believe that the democrats would take money from communist countries to help them obtain elected office in the US? And that, in return, these democrats would provide favors to their benefactors. My answer is a resounding, "HELL YES!" And the FEC came out yesterday and fined the Democrats for taking money from commie China. Now, how long has this been going on, and what did they get in return? Surely they are not having an oosik and just wanted to supplant our country with cash.

To: gao seng who wrote (299540)	9/24/2002 12:57:25 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

both mainstream parties in this country have been entirely co-opted. If a democrat were President at the time of 9/11, nothing would be different now. What does make a difference is for every individual to examine any precipitous situation. The means to do so should not be hindered. Party affiliation does not matter when a hindrance to that end is put forth. The current global/strategic climate is obviously fraught with obfuscation and systematic hindrance of trustworthy dissemination of reliable information. Supposedly trusted, official institutions are exerting overwhelming influence on the normally accepted channels of information. Avenues of inquiry are being narrowed. I look at the specific people involved rather than their party affiliation and make my own judgements. If on one occasion our President says he ordered a full governmental emergency response "IMMEDIATELY" after the first plane hit the WTC...and on another, later, occasion he claims to have not realized there was a threat...just a "terrible pilot"...I don't care what party he's in. If he says he saw a plane on TV hit the tower BEFORE the second plane struck...he must be referring to the first plane. He said he saw that plane on TV before he went into the classroom and that's the first he knew about the attack. The 2nd plane did not strike until AFTER he was in the classroom so he could NOT have seen the 2nd strike and mistaken it for the 1st. He lied...twice...about the SAME very important moment in history when HE was at the helm, nobody else...not Clinton...not Gore...not Carter, Reagan, or Ghandi...plain and simple...I don't care what party he's in.