Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (66223)	9/24/2002 10:24:44 AM
From: Cary Salsberg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

In 1967, Arabs mobilized armies and declared their intention, again, to destroy Israel. Preemptive is probably only technically correct here. Israel took out a nuclear plant. I am in favor of Bush instructing the air force to take out dangerous facilities. I am opposed to an invasion without an explicit "clear and present danger". I don't think I am "blinded" by my "hatred". I don't think it is "hatred". Rather, it is loathing. I see the President of the United States cut from the same cloth as his friend Ken Lay and all the other "successful" businessmen who have ripped off the American people. Today, you saw a good example of the Bush administration's understanding of foreign policy. The UN resolution should have been vetoed, pure and simple. It is OBSCENE to have Iraq as public enemy #1 and Syria on the Security Council. They are the same. So, you think Bush will veto a UN resolution to send a UN force against Israel? That is the next step, you know. The Security Council has scum countries, Russia, China, Syria, leading the charge. What does "scum" mean? The average American looks at those countries and thanks god that he is living here.