Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (171210)	9/24/2002 4:38:43 PM
From: Eric K.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: banned from SI because of multiple IDs Has anyone figured out something more concrete on the FUDster in chief's actual offense? If he was posting under multiple aliases, what was the other alias? Was it just a TOS violation? What happened to Penang Paul Engel? -Eric

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (171210)	9/24/2002 4:42:04 PM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 186894

Got class? Snort. See Bob's message: investorshub.com We take a very dim view of posts that just bash people, and had half the posts on this board been deleted, I doubt Matt would've restored them. And guess where half the posts came from. SI's gain is ihub's loss.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (171210)	9/24/2002 10:19:58 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Jim, <The joke is that they have suddenly "got class" and they are running a moderated thread of their own.> At least they have more class than someone who pretends he has the TA smackdown on INTC, but instead is just a flamer who is obsessed with personal vendettas. (I'm not talking about Alan, by the way.) But Alan is right on one thing. This thread has returned to INTC as an investment, and I think that's a good thing. The viewpoints are very different (basically FA vs. TA vs. LT vs. ST), but the more, the merrier. And the flamers can get lost for all I care. Tenchusatsu