Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (152249)	9/24/2002 7:24:09 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 1572777

Ted, re:But just for the record, I don't give a fukk so why do you......unless you're planning to vote for him? ted I thought you did care why Gore lost the election; you certainly have enough posts on the subject. Steve

To: tejek who wrote (152249)	9/24/2002 8:35:08 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572777

But just for the record, I don't give a fukk so why do you What's the point of this? Do you think (a) nobody knows what you mean (in which case it serves no purpose) or (b) it isn't really like saying what you mean because you spelled it a little differently? This is such a great metaphor for all that is wrong with liberalism. You know the rules. But because you're a [flaming] liberal, you can bend those rules, so that TECHNICALLY you're in compliance but substantively you're not. This is the same thing I experienced for years doing tax work for liberals -- they all want big government spending, then they come in wanting to cheat on their taxes (I can't recall even once a conservative asking me to bend the rules on their taxes; but almost every liberal does). It just struck me as interesting. From the tinest infraction to the Clinton-styled corruption, liberals think their corruption is nonexistent because of some oddball interpretation of the word "is", or, maybe "fukk". Funny. Typical.