Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (59781)	9/24/2002 8:54:19 PM
From: theeleventhmuse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I agree that there are variations in nature. The point I was trying to illustrate is that, statistically speaking, I believe there is more symmetry and similarities in nature and creatures than there is randomness. Where similarities point to a designer and randomness would point to no designer, but random occurrences. Examples where similarities point to one entity who designed the action: A human detective looks for similarities in crimes to point to point to the perpetrator. A creative interior designer often has a style that is distinguishable from all other interior designers. Any craftsman artist who tries to design random art and then goes to a craft show will notice that their art fits into a category and is similar to only the designer and not similar to any other designer. This is why I feel that the designs of nature are so similar to each other that it points to one designer. I am not supporting whether the entity is a benevolent God or not. But again statistically, there is more good than bad in nature and again pointing away from randomness. If there was more evil than good, our earth would likely be destroyed and there would be no evidence of our designer. Therefore the theory that good outweighs evil is another discussion. This is my theory and maybe I should ask my God directly for a definitive answer though the evidence strongly points in favor of my theory of one designer of nature or at least a leader of the contractors for nature. The reason that I feel that it is a God that is smarter than we are, is the intricacy of the design and the resiliency of the packaging (skin). I know of a neighbor who seems to have a direct line to answers from God and may be able to help me find a definitive answer for you. I seem to have a broken line of communication to God, but try to keep it open. I am still learning and studying and may not be at the point of a direct line of communication yet; probably because I am too busy being out in nature instead of attending Church. I present my theories here because you on SI are all so very good at dissecting all writing and knowledge that you might be able to find any holes in my theory which I feel is so rock solid. I hope you do not find any holes which I can not explain as I am very happy in my beliefs.