Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. T. who wrote (148123)	9/26/2002 9:24:37 AM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

I believe they have a legitimate claim, but nothing occurred in 2000 for Arafat to leave Clinton's negotiating table (is there something in Clinton's proposal that was abhorrent) and begin suicide bombing. Back to your usual pack of lies, eh? 1. Arafat did not leave the negotiating table. Barak left the table. 2. Suicide bombing began in November 2000, after a month of Israeli military siege on Palestinian towns and Israeli settler terrorism on Palestinian civilians. 3. The suicide bombing has nothing to do with Arafat. I mean, if everything bad that is said about Israel is true, suicide bombing instead of negotiations is not justified, imo. Well, that point is debatable. Some would say that Israel is a garrison state, and the vast majority of the population is in the military, was in the military, or will be in the military. Certainly, the government is a thinly disguised military junta. And since the takeover of Palestinian land is being perpetrated by Israeli "civilians", it is difficult to paint them as "innocent". Tom