Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (148144)	9/26/2002 1:53:01 PM
From: Thomas M.	Respond to of 164684

Yup. Not only that, check out the explicit American condemnation of forcing "regime change" on Iraq: Message 18037963 While Saddam was using poison gas, we told the victims of his poison gas that they MUST NOT try to oust him from power. Currently, with his poison gas supplies either gone or minimal, and with zero history of aggression against us, we MUST oust him at all costs. Huh? Tom

To: GST who wrote (148144)	9/26/2002 3:46:17 PM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 164684

Saddam resists a push into exile Qatar presents option to avoid 'catastrophe' usatoday.com

To: GST who wrote (148144)	9/26/2002 5:52:11 PM
From: Gary Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

>>Not that it matters - but do you think we were right in helping Saddam to gas hundreds of thousands of Iranaians? Of course not. And also we helped Bin Laden in Afghanistan in the late 80's. We helped Castro at one point. Not that it matters, but do you think the Americans who helped Hitler by supporting his Fascist state prior to Pearl Harbor and who argued for isolationism were wrong? We can't change the past, only learn from it. And what we learned is that Saddam is capable of mass murder.