Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (66319)	9/26/2002 2:46:28 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 70976

JS, Saddam is too far along to allow him to continue in power. Each case is different. After South Korean and Japanese progress with NK, we are sending a high level envoy. With Iran we wait for regime change from within. Iraq is the most unstable situation. A leader who is a cross between Joseph Stalin and Al Capone, no chance for peaceful internal change, no regional players to help the situation. I suspect he will go either from the war to come or in an unexpected way like carys assasination scenario. Yes and a deal could be struck if he it is verified that all wmd are gone and he changes his stripes and decides to be saddam the capitalist selling oil for profit and raking in the bucks. Unlikely. mike