Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (60083)	9/27/2002 2:36:40 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I am more concerned with the ideal tribunal, as it were, where one makes every effort to square the matter with conscience. And I admit there may be reasons to not want to plead your case before a given person or group, or to not be able to because they are too much a product of different social norms to understand. Also, of course, there are transgressions that are too trivial to be constantly excusing oneself for. But I do think that there are other interested parties in many instances to whom one owes an explanation if the matter comes up, and that one should be eager enough to show that one's case can stand up to scrutiny, and to sustain the bond of trust, if possible, with those who question one........

To: The Philosopher who wrote (60083)	9/27/2002 2:57:07 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Also, I should clarify how this fits in which my "absolutism". I believe that societies improve when given the opportunity, through the accumulation of knowledge and its application in easing and ennobling the lives of as many people as can be brought along, given practical limits. As societies improve, their morals improve, both as a reflection of the values that underwrite a successful society, and through actual insight gained in the course of philosophical reflection on ethics. In both ways, there is moral progress, or greater moral objectivity (assuming that one approaches an optimum goal for society, and therefore that there are values which are the final word, or nearly so). Thus, some "value systems" are superior to others, namely, those associated with societies which make life for most people more humane and productive. Now, let me be clear: we must do our best to understand that social change is not easy, and that the values of a given society are integral to its cohesion, and cannot be easily flouted. Therefore, we must have respect for the multiplicity of views we encounter, in order to respect individuals and to not unnecessarily provoke backlash. However, it is desirable, for the ultimate good of the planet, that there be a move towards modernization and the liberal civilization of which we are a part, with all deliberate speed, and so we should not get overly sentimental about picturesque cultures or cultural equivalence.........