Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (60126)	9/27/2002 5:24:46 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"feral animal" is the more common expression. Or, for children raised by animals (of whom there have apparently been a handful, for real), "feral children." I read an interesting thing about that. It has often been wolves who have been said to have nursed lost human children. I assumed it was a myth, but I read that an explanation might lie in the fact that wolves don't kill in or near their own homes. (Dens? Lairs?) So if a hungry child got within a certain distance, and lost its human smell and took on the smell of the baby wolves, it might end up being suckled instead of killed. I don't attest that this is true. But I did read it.