Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just_Observing who wrote (47654)	9/28/2002 11:31:54 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

What is the Sidney Morning Herald and why should I believe Paul McGeough? I gather the paper is an Australian paper. How about some commentary on what it's all about as a paper and why we should believe pieces published therein. And, it would also help to know a bit about McGeough's track record.

To: Just_Observing who wrote (47654)	9/29/2002 1:07:12 AM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

If this article is to be believed, Bush's main goal is control of world oil markets. And we need to invade Iraq to do this... how? If oil was the driving concern, a very cynical and caustic view at best, we would jump on the Russia/France "end the sanctions!" bandwagon and suck em dry. Or don't you think ExxonMobil would just LOVE to get into those Iraqi reserves with as little mess as possible? Dog don't hunt. Derek

To: Just_Observing who wrote (47654)	9/29/2002 4:58:43 AM
From: frankw1900	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The unifying element in an often-contradictory US foreign policy is the dream of toppling OPEC and controlling the world oil market. And Iraq is the key, writes Paul McGeough from Riyadh. World oil market is also the subject of a cartel which is so incompetent it can't even figure out how to set prices and make them stick. The members all cheat on each other, anyhow. Don't have to control the market. World's awash in oil. The problem, short term, is that that Saudi is the swing producer but that status is being challenged by Russia in the near future. If you put yourself in the position of the US government after 9/11, then can see it wants to stop, or at least reduce hugely the amount of money going into Saudi. Solution: encourage the Russians and invest in their oil production, which they are doing. Iraq also could be a swing producer. I think this is actually inconvenient for the US in terms of getting the Russians totally onside about Iraq, but then the Russians aren't as dependent as Saudi or some other oil prducers on oil revenue, so I expect after some horse trading Russians will come around. In no case does US have to control oil market. It's just in its interest there's lots of oil being produced. Sure it'd be nice for some US oil companies to have a piece of Iraq pie but it's not necessary in terms of US security or prosperity. One more thing. Given Saddam is a nitwit, it's entirely possible the concessions he's selling to Chinese, etc, are on really bad terms for Iraq. So all these etcs may have some interest in not seeing his regime go down. Given the Bush family history it's very easy to impute the Shrub is doing everything for Dad and pals. I don't think that's likely and it's certainly not provable. What some people think about that depends on their politics, I think.