Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sawdusty who wrote (28280)	9/28/2002 9:02:15 PM
From: Cytotekk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Digr did not keep us on the Pinks, the SEC did. eom C in O

To: Sawdusty who wrote (28280)	9/29/2002 12:45:15 AM
From: MilesM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Sarge, Sure, the SEC was the main problem at the time, but Digger saying "I told you so" over and over while everyone else was saying the SEC was wrong, only fueled the flames wouldn't you say? Yes, the stock did spike when TT won, and then there was some selling by the insiders. Isn't that consistent with most companies? These people have basically been working for free for how many years? Would you? I wouldn't! The fact that they chose to sell their stock when the price was up, indicated their willingness to wait to sell the least amount of stock to get their money out. The opposite of that is that is causes the least amount of damage to the value. I think that also explains why insiders sell now as opposed to when the price is down. Does that answer your questions? MM