Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: spiral3 who wrote (47793)	9/28/2002 9:06:34 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

look, you’ve got this exactly backwards, hatred is not the result, it is the source. If your proposition were true, it fits that the blacks should have hated the whites but then where is the racially motivated mass violence in South Africa now, or more importantly where was it during the oppression and subsequent occupation, say between 1886 to 1996. ...If your dogma is absolute one would think that the Jews, as the whites of Palestine, should hate a hell of a lot more people than just the Palestinians, but my impression is that this is just not the case. The jews could not possibly have survived this long if they were haters, as opposed to being the hated, it’s just not how it works, I mean check out the demographics for gods sake. Hatred doesn’t come from others, it comes from oneself, it is an internal, self replicating auto generating mutation. Yes, exactly right. But SFD has imbibed the Palestinian narrative, hook line and sinker, taught daily to thousands of students who know so little history that they couldn't place the Boer War before or after WWII if they tried. The Palestinian narrative makes hatred and terrorism sound like such reasonable options that no thinks to ask, "if you say that you had no other option, could you please tell me what else you tried before you resorted to blowing up buses?"