Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (47875)	9/29/2002 4:50:11 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 281500

Looks like the Congressional Intelligence Committees have figured out that Intel needs a overall boss. How to do it is the problem. From "LA Times" Panel Proposes Cabinet-Level Chief to Oversee Spy Agencies Espionage: Amid probe of Sept. 11 failures, the Senate committee's plan would take control of the 13 organizations away from the CIA director. By GREG MILLER Times Staff Writer September 28 2002 WASHINGTON -- The ranking members of the Senate Intelligence Committee said they favor creating a new Cabinet-level position with authority over the nation's spy agencies, stripping that control away from the CIA director. The proposal--almost certain to face major resistance from Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld--has emerged as one of the major recommendations lawmakers are likely to make at the culmination of their investigation into the intelligence failures surrounding Sept. 11. A final report from lawmakers is due early next year. "I believe that we need a chairman of the board, a CEO, of the entire intelligence community," said Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.), the intelligence panel's vice-chairman, on Friday. Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), chairman of the intelligence committee, also endorsed the idea, designed to end an often-criticized arrangement in which the CIA director has little leverage over other agencies. The CIA director is technically in charge of coordinating the efforts of all 13 of the nation's spy agencies. But 85% of the U.S. intelligence budget is controlled by the Pentagon and the Secretary of Defense. As a result, lawmakers say, the CIA director struggles to set agendas and control allocation of resources across the community. Much of the structure of these agencies will be affected by homeland security legislation pending before Congress. The idea to split the director's position has gathered new momentum in recent weeks amid disclosures in congressional hearings that numerous corners of the intelligence community failed to heed, or sometimes even hear, warnings from CIA Director George J. Tenet about the Al Qaeda threat. In 1998, for example, Tenet issued a memo declaring "war" on Al Qaeda and ordering that no expense be spared in the intelligence community in the pursuit of the terrorist group and its founder, Osama bin Laden. But congressional investigators found little evidence that the memo prompted a significant mobilization. A preliminary report issued last week said that in 2000, the CIA had just five analysts in its counterterrorism center tracking Al Qaeda. The CIA later said the actual number was nine. Moreover, FBI agents interviewed by investigators said they weren't even aware of Tenet's declaration, prompting lawmakers to wonder whether Tenet had failed to follow up or whether the community was too fragmented. For years, blue-ribbon commissions have recommended strengthening the director's hand by giving him broader control over intelligence purse strings. But the proposals have always foundered, often because of opposition from the Pentagon, which stands to lose control over billions of dollars of its budget. Shelby and Graham acknowledged that the idea will have an uphill climb. The recommendation is likely to "stir up a lot of hornets," Graham said in a television interview Wednesday. "There will be people who currently have that power who will feel threatened and resist." Indeed, Rumsfeld has already moved to consolidate authority over intelligence matters in the Pentagon. At his urging, the Senate recently passed a bill creating a new position--the undersecretary of defense for intelligence--that would oversee vast swaths of the spy community, including the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency. The House has yet to vote on the proposal, a Pentagon official said. Many intelligence insiders say Rumsfeld's move would erode Tenet's position because many of his coordination responsibilities would probably be absorbed by the new Pentagon undersecretary. "It is essentially a demotion" for the CIA director, said a former senior CIA official who asked not to be identified. Officials at the Pentagon and CIA declined to comment. The proposal to split the director into two positions also faces practical hurdles. CIA directors wield influence in Washington largely because of power and access that stems from their position atop the CIA itself. CIA directors control the operations of overseas spies and are responsible for briefing the president on information collected by every other spy agency. A new Cabinet-level intelligence director wouldn't necessarily perform those functions and could get lost in the burgeoning bureaucratic trellis of homeland security, domestic law enforcement and intelligence in the White House. If that happens, "he becomes like the drug czar," said the former CIA official, referring to a position often dismissed as a figurehead. latimes.com

To: maceng2 who wrote (47875)	9/29/2002 10:07:41 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Although the war with Iraq looked as if it had a favorable conclusion, hindsight tells us the job was not finished properly. It wasn't favorable to me... But the UN had only authorized the US to liberate Kuwait, not overthrow Saddam. So Bush Sr. might only be blamed for not pressing hard enough for his overthrow. However, after 12 years of having to put up with him and his duplicity and threats, it's time to put an end to his regime. The UN let Saddam off easy at the end of Desert Storm, let him off in the inspections process, and are trying to let him off even now.. And now the US, being sick of having to expose ourselves to his aggression and attempts to subvert or destroy his neighboring nations, is required to do what the UN doesn't have the backbone to do. Hawk