Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (66332)	9/29/2002 10:43:54 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 70976

Actually, re: Iraq, I am in the camp that say do not initiate a bellicose act until and unless it is absolutely clear to the rest of the world that Saddam is the aggressor. The best approach, as I said before, would be for us to "acquire" the right of retaliation (self defense) the Israeli still have for the unanswered 39 scud missiles lobbed at it by Saddam during the last conflict. I also think that we should be smart enough to get rid of Sadam without killing thousands of Iraqi's in the process. We felled the "evil empire" without a shot, don't tell me we cannot get that tyrant out short of a full conflagration. If the administration is short of ideas, they should hire me as a consultant on that subject, I have at least ten good ideas how to approach that problem (vbg) without spending $100 Billions on an all out war. I won't charge even .1% of the cost saving (g). Zeev