Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1778)	9/29/2002 7:00:55 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8683

You've frequently said the US created Saddam and gave him WMD's including bio, chemical, and nuclear. I don't believe any of the above but I also can deduce that you don't either. Because if you really believed these claims you would also think it is America's responsibility to rectify the situation by removing the problem we created - Saddam. But you don't. Therefore, your claims are insincere. So, according to your legal logic, a country can sell another country weaponry, and then use that as a justification for invasion and seizure of oil fields? LOL! It's not surprising you are having fake debates with yourself ("leftist guide to debating"), since you embarrass yourself continuously when debating me. Germany sank American ships leading to America's entry into WWI as I showed in an earlier post. American ships were carrying British military equipment. And the British military was blockading Germany. Your article didn't mention that little piece of info about the Lusitania, for some odd reason. This was an ugly regional dispute, with no clear aggressor. Well, Saddam expelled arms inspectors years ago. So what do you want to do about it? Saddam didn't expel the weapons inspectors. Tom