Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (48241)	9/30/2002 12:13:12 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Tek posted recently that he and Pollack were laughing about the NeoCon's inability to quote him. Stanley Kurtz loves him. Yep, saw tek's comment. If I were you I wouldn't trust Kurtz' rendition of Pollack. Pollack's book is very serious, multifaceted, policy analysis of a very high order. Kurtz strikes me as more like an Alexander Cockburn of the right than anything else. Serious, of course, but perpetually writes the same thing whatever he is writing about. Nothing new, ever.

To: LindyBill who wrote (48241)	9/30/2002 12:23:16 PM
From: tekboy	Respond to of 281500

Tek posted recently that he and Pollack were laughing about the NeoCon's inability to quote him. Stanley Kurtz loves him. ahem. tek posted that they were laughing about the low odds of the administration's quoting him, not necessarily neocons more generally. there's a decent bit of diversity within the broader neocon camp, and individuals can often surprise one. And as something of an ex-neocon myself, and someone with a number of neocon friends, I hardly would tar all of them with a loonytunes brush. (Check out Steve Rosen's op-ed in the WSJ journal today, for example, for a very nice piece of analysis.) tb@:0P.com