Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48260)	9/30/2002 11:40:20 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 281500

Drugs became prevalent after we invaded. Invaded?? Would you apply the same denifition to the Chinese and Russian troops who were stationed in the North, and without whose vast military, finacial, and economic assistance the North could not have "liberated" the south?? Hawk@ifyouregoingtosmokethatwaccytobaccybringenoughforeveryone.com

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48260)	9/30/2002 10:43:03 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hi Karen Lawrence; Re: "Lets see, we ended up with a "stalemate" between North and South Korea from way back in the mid-50s and North Korea is STILL menacing South Korea. NOT a success story." Help me here. I'm trying to decide which of these alternative histories would have been the "success story": (1) The US fights Communist China in North Korea for 20 extra years, killing millions. (2) MacAurther nukes the Chinese, resulting in a world-wide war that kills nearly a billion. (3) The US ceases support for Korea and the North takes over, resulting in twice as many people now starving under a backwards Communist regime. -- Carl@Sometimesthereisnopossiblesuccessstory.com