Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (302287)	9/30/2002 12:28:04 PM
From: SeachRE	Respond to of 769670

So much written so little said(SMWSLS). Troubling...

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (302287)	9/30/2002 12:35:07 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

>>No chance that this UN clown, Gwozdecky, has an anti-US agenda<< Well...the shrub and his henchmen have certainly done as much as they can think of to offer any foreign power (oops...I forgot...foreigners, by default cannot consider that they might have anything resembling power in the LLH global scheme) a legitimate reason to at least lean toward being anti-US. Pride in one's country arises from how one's country is perceived by others. To denigrate opinions voiced by other countries is to assume the PEOPLE of those countries are INFERIOR....are you so ready to be so prejudiced? If so...you are worse than a mindless sheep.

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (302287)	9/30/2002 1:00:44 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

No chance that this UN clown, Gwozdecky, has an anti-US agenda, or a desire to cover his own ass, and is thus twisting the truth? No need to answer? I'll be happy to answer that. Are you completely stupid? McClennan kept on changing the answer when the Washington Times checked on him. You moron. After McClennan ran out of IAEA reports, then he tried referring to news articles... To clear up the confusion, Mr. McClellan cited two news articles from 1991 — a July 16 story in the London Times by Michael Evans and a July 18 story in the New York Times by Paul Lewis. But neither article cites an IAEA report on Iraq's nuclear-weapons program or states that Saddam was only six months away from "developing a weapon" — as claimed by Mr. Bush. Hello.....is anyone home?.....McClellan cited London Times Articles and New York Times articles and the Washington Times confirmed that the content that McClennan claimed was not in there. jttmab