SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1822)9/30/2002 2:43:38 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8683
 
STOP BUSH'S IMMORAL WAR OF IMPERIALISM PAGE 3

BUSH'S PROPOSED WAR AND CURRENT THREATS VIOLATE THE U.S.
CONSTITUTION, THE U.N. CHARTER AND INTERNATIONAL LAW

Bush's preemptive war policy and proposed attack on Iraq
cannot be justified under any form of established law.

The preemptive war policy and Bush's threatened new
military assault on Iraq violates U.S. domestic law and
international law. The warmongering, preparations for war,
and threats of violence coming from Bush, Cheney,
Rumsfeld, Rice and other White House and Pentagon hawks,
are in and of themselves violations of international law
and constitute crimes against peace.

Article VI of the U.S. Constitution establishes that
ratified treaties, such as the U.N. Charter, are the
"supreme law of the land."

The Article 1 of the U.N. Charter establishes

"The purposes of the United Nations are . . . To maintain
international peace and sovereignty, and to that end: to
take effective collective measures for the prevention and
removals of threats to the peace, and for the suppression
of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace and
to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with
the principles of justice and international law,
adjustment or settlement of international disputes or
situations which might lead to a breach of the peace . .
."

Article 2 states that all member states "shall act in
accordance with the following Principles"

". . . All members shall settle their international
disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that
international peace and security, and justice, are not
endangered.

"All members shall refrain in their international
relations from the threat or use of force against the
territorial integrity or political independence of any
state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the
Purposes of the United Nations . . ."

Under this framework, acts of aggression, such as Bush's
threatened attack, are to be suppressed and force is used
only as a last and unavoidable resort.

The U.N. Charter was enacted in 1945 in the aftermath of
the devastation and suffering of World War II. The Charter
was enacted to bring an end to acts of aggression, "to
save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which
twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to
mankind."

Disputes which might lead to a breach of the peace are
required to be resolved *by peaceful means.*

Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter, "Pacific Settlement of
Disputes," requires countries to "first of all, seek a
resolution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation,
conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to
regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means
of their own choice."