Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (60330)	9/30/2002 6:32:06 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Also, if it is your fault, a simple apology without explanation will do, assuming it is sincere and not perfunctory. Ah. That seems to answer one of my previous questions, but let me nail it down. If person A disaccomodates person B, whether it's being late to a meeting, not repaying a loan on time, or whatever, then by the social norms person A owes person B an apology, and if they don't offer one they're a bad person. But they do not owe any explanation, but are free to give one or not as they choose, and if they choose not to they are not a bad person for making that decision. Can we agree on this?