Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carl a. mehr who wrote (171364)	9/30/2002 10:42:38 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 186894

RE:"He sounded like he was crying in his beer feeling sorry for himself! Why did he not come out swinging like New York General Attorney Eliot Spitzer in defense of the shareholders! I hope that we have honest people at the helm of Intel -Past and present CEO's and presidents. So my question is: Can Intel pass the Eliot Spitzer test for honesty" All us Intel shareholders are bag holders. EOM. Jim

To: carl a. mehr who wrote (171364)	10/1/2002 11:19:12 AM
From: GVTucker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

carl, RE: Can Intel pass the Eliot Spitzer test for honesty I spend a majority of every day looking for red flags in publicly traded companies. Almost always, a company that has been dishonest will exhibit one or many red flags that are essentially a tip off that something unusual is going on. It isn't always illegal, but it does fall in the dishonesty department, which invariably harms shareholders and causes lawsuits from Spitzer. WorldCom, Tyco, Enron...all those companies had those red flags before they blew up. Granted, companies that exhibit these red flags don't always end up in the corporate graveyard, but everyone in the graveyard does have the red flags. Thus far, Intel does not.