SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (152694)9/30/2002 11:30:21 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586265
 
I don't think we should let Saddam off the hook. However, I don't see the justification of going to war at this time.

This, I think, is a reasonable position. However, don't you think that Saddam has effectively been let "off the hook" already -- over the last 4 years?

If we do get inspectors back in, should they not insist on true cooperation -- something that the UNSCOM inspectors NEVER received? And shouldn't the UN determine, a priori, what the consequences shall be should Saddam fail to comply?

It sounds to me like your position and George Bush's aren't really that far apart.



To: tejek who wrote (152694)9/30/2002 11:51:33 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586265
 
Ted,

if you want to say the above, its your prerogative but let me make clear my position one more time. I don't think we should let Saddam off the hook. However, I don't see the justification of going to war at this time. But should Saddam screw with the weapons inspectors or refuses to cooperate, then I am more than willing to see us undertake military action with the support and cooperation of our allies, and the approval of Congress.

Except the position on our (finicky) allies, I guess our views are not that far apart, despite a lot of hot air posted here.

On Congress, I am definitely for each Congressman signing his name on where stands. And I would like them to run on their votes. Especially the George Mitchel crowd, who wanted to keep Saddam in Kuwait by giving the sanctions a chance in 1991. BTW, we have had (somewhat non-sensical) sanctions on Iraq in place for more than a decade now, with no effects.

Joe